After receiving detailed feedback during the tutorial, I was able to clearly define the next steps and refine my thesis proposal effectively. One of my first actions was to rewrite the literature review, focusing on paraphrasing existing sources instead of using direct quotations. This helped reduce similarity concerns and allowed me to present the ideas more cohesively in my own words.
I also expanded my list of keywords related to digital identity, virtual environments, embodiment, and self-perception. Using these, I conducted a deeper search for academic articles and case studies to broaden the scope of my bibliography. This helped me situate my research within a wider academic context and strengthened the theoretical foundation of my work.
Revisiting the chapter structure was another key step. I reviewed and refined each chapter’s focus to ensure clearer alignment with the research question. This helped me create a more logical flow between chapters and sharpened the overall coherence of the proposal.
Following this, I completed a first draft of Chapter 1, “Identity in the Digital Age.” Writing this chapter gave me a solid base to build upon and helped translate my theoretical ideas into formal academic writing. The draft covers the evolution of identity, how digital technologies reshape it, and the emergence of fluid, multifaceted digital selves.
I am now identifying and reviewing more academic sources related to key themes such as digital embodiment, self-presentation on social media, and psychological impacts of virtual identities. This expanded reading will help frame my research within a wider academic context and provide stronger support for my arguments. Alongside this, I am refining my approach to thematic analysis to organize and critically assess the literature more effectively.
Additionally, I will develop a clearer and more detailed methodology section, outlining the theoretical and thematic analysis approaches that will guide my research. Throughout, I will ensure all claims and discussions are well-supported by academic evidence to avoid speculation and maintain a balanced argument.